Free & Open Source

Analyze any repository
like a recruiter would.

Get a deterministic 0–100 score across documentation, commits, tech stack, and architecture — with actionable improvement suggestions.

Try:··

What gets analyzed?

Four independent analyzers evaluate your repository across the dimensions that matter most to technical recruiters and senior engineers.

README Quality

25%

Checks for installation instructions, usage examples, badges, screenshots, architecture docs, and code blocks.

Commit Discipline

20%

Analyzes temporal spread, conventional commit usage, message quality, and detects burst/duplicate patterns.

Tech Stack Maturity

30%

Detects frameworks, testing, linting, TypeScript, CI/CD, containerization, and state management setup.

Architecture Complexity

25%

Evaluates folder depth, separation of concerns, modularity (Shannon entropy), and penalizes anti-patterns.

How it works

From URL to actionable report in under 30 seconds.

1

Paste a GitHub URL

Enter any public GitHub repository URL and click analyze.

2

Parallel data fetching

6 parallel GitHub API calls fetch metadata, commits, tree, README, languages, and package.json.

3

Deterministic scoring

4 pure-function analyzers produce a weighted 0–100 score. Same repo = same score, always.

4

Actionable report

Get findings, strengths, suggestions, risk flags, and optionally an AI-enhanced improvement roadmap.

Hiring confidence levels

Your score maps to a confidence level that reflects how a technical recruiter would perceive the project.

Low0 – 40

Project needs significant work before it demonstrates engineering quality. Missing key signals like testing, proper documentation, or structured architecture.

Moderate41 – 70

Decent engineering fundamentals with clear room for improvement. Shows some good practices but lacks consistency across all dimensions.

Strong71 – 100

Production-quality engineering signals across most categories. Well-documented, well-tested, well-structured, and professionally committed.

100% Deterministic

Same repository data always produces the same score. No randomness, no AI in the scoring pipeline.

Fully Explainable

Every point earned or lost traces back to a specific metric with a specific threshold. No black boxes.

AI-Enhanced (Optional)

Google Gemini optionally rewrites suggestions into a prioritized improvement roadmap. AI never affects scoring.